A comparison piece covering Relay, Peerdraft, Live Share and Nectenda #88
Labels
No labels
area:docs
area:identity
area:ops
area:plugin
area:server
channel:community
channel:direct
channel:owned
channel:press
channel:social
e2ee-constrained
gate:at-ga
gate:pre-ga
marketing
parity
relay:absent
relay:planned
relay:requested
relay:supported
risk:additive
risk:contract
risk:none
usability
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
Nectenda/nectenda#88
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Why
Searching "obsidian live collaboration" returns Relay, Peerdraft, an archived
Obsidian Hub page and two forum threads. Nectenda appears nowhere.
Publish it off nectenda.com
Deliberately not on our own domain. A comparison on your own site is marking
your own homework, and the value here is the backlink and the mention, not a
page of ours ranking.
The cost is real and should be stated rather than glossed: it gives up the
"obsidian collaboration alternatives" traffic a page on our own domain would
have caught. Ranked 7,463rd by downloads, that is the right trade — authority we do
not have has to be borrowed before it is earned.
Bound by docs/positioning.md
(source-available, non-compete); server and e2e are proprietary.
"more secure than Obsidian Sync", and never claim to be more open than Relay.
Canvas collaboration today, Relay is the right answer today, and the piece
should say so.
Accuracy
docs/competition-relay.mdis the sourced snapshot and is itself stale — seethe open issues to refresh it to 0.8.12 and to stop crediting Relay with RBAC
they do not ship. Re-read the competitor rather than recalling them.
Moved to the Vikunja board as NEC-64: https://projectron.nerchure.com/tasks/64